Highlight Report HR-04

The Project Office › Parcel A (Phase 1) › Highlight Reports › HR-04

Date

21 October 2026

21 October 2026

Period covered

21 October 2026 (to 18:30)

21 October 2026 (to 18:30)

Status summary

AMBER On time. 23 replies sent to public bodies in their own threads; the 1936 Llwyn-yr-eryr auction placed in Llandough-juxta-Penarth; the 1923 peace petition filed as EV-0294. HM Land Registry copies and subject access reply still outstanding. Case spend £0.00.

This reporting period

10 entries

Work packages

Pending authorisation

None this period.

In execution

  • Reply sprint (Executive’s authority to send, 15:31): 23 replies sent today, each in its original thread; none bounced. About 155 threads from before June not yet checked.
  • Nomenclature: 25 concepts and 147 record names, each with its source and date.
  • Website-change tracking for institutions’ pages: 68 pages kept as plainly about the farm and Llandough, 87 kept as possibly relevant, 76 set aside (reversible).

Completed in the period

None this period.

Products completed in the period

  • Glamorgan Archives DSA/14/91 research: the 14 May 1936 auction was of Llwyn-yr-eryr, Llandough, Penarth (one lot, leasehold, about 4¾ acres); withdrawn, the reserve not reached (Western Mail, 15 May 1936); failed again in October 1936; seller Charles St David Spencer.
  • EV-0294: Welsh Women’s Peace Petition 1923, Llandough sheet (National Library of Wales); Esther Williams is the 8th signature on page 1 with the address “Llandough”. That she was the mother of Mary (Nancy) Williams, formerly Buckler, is believed by the family; the 1911/1921 census or the 1913 birth entry would confirm it.
  • Replies on the three PDF answers: South Wales Police FOI 1040/26 (internal review requested, due 18 Nov); ICO IC-546505-W6P0 (in-remit routes asked about); Cadw ATISN 27589 (already challenged on 19 Oct; no reply needed).
  • Overdue chase: Vale FOI 00211483 (due 16 Oct): ICO referral if nothing by 4 Nov.
  • South Wales Police subject access request: the 30 Sep clarification question answered; due 29 Oct.

Products planned but not started or completed in the period

  • Cardiff and Vale Health Board deceased-records application form (sent 21 Aug): needs the applicant’s own signature.

Corrective actions taken during the period

  • Two sent replies were worded more firmly than the record supports (a booked archive visit; the stage of the HM Land Registry complaints review); in-thread corrections offered to the Executive.

Next reporting period

6 entries

Work packages (to be authorised, in execution, to be completed)

  • Remaining reply sprint threads (before June).
  • Nightly drafts run at 05:30.

Products to be completed in the next period

  • 22 Oct, 19:00: Llandough Community Council meeting, Item 10 (remote).
  • By 28 Oct: HM Land Registry subject access reply.
  • 29 Oct: South Wales Police subject access reply due.

Corrective actions to be completed during the next period

  • In-thread corrections to the two loosely worded replies, if the Executive agrees.

Project and stage tolerance status

Tolerances not yet agreed by the Project Board
Tolerance areaTolerance setStatus this period
TimeNot yet agreed by the Project BoardWithin.
CostNot yet agreed by the Project BoardWithin: case spend £0.00. Paid copies of DSA/14/91 and DSA/8/32 not ordered (the Executive’s decision).
QualityNot yet agreed by the Project BoardWithin; two loosely worded replies to be corrected.
ScopeNot yet agreed by the Project BoardUnchanged.
BenefitsNot yet agreed by the Project BoardNot yet set by the Executive.
RiskNot yet agreed by the Project BoardOne new risk, see below.
SustainabilityNot yet agreed by the Project BoardNot assessed.

Requests for change

0 raised · 0 decided · 2 pending

Raised

None this period.

Approved or rejected

None this period.

Pending

  • CH-009 footer policy.
  • CH-011 WordPress plan.

Key issues and risks

5 items
  • Against the case: if the archive’s note is right, the 5.3-acre field in the 1939 letting (DBDT/123/7) was part of Llwyn-yr-eryr in 1936, not Great House Farm, so that letting cannot mark out the farm. Only DSA/14/91 itself or the auctioneer’s sale book DSA/8/32 can show the boundary (paid copy or visit).
  • Cadw wrote at 15:39 that further farm emails “will be filed but not answered” without new evidence; reply sent copying Welsh Government Complaints, asking whether this is the final response.
  • South Wales Police FOI 1189/26: the 28 Sep preservation notice is not an FOI request; written hold asked for.
  • National Library images on EV-0294 are “copyright undetermined”: not for paid products.
  • Prospective grounds to reopen the 1987 judgment: 28 experiments to 20 Oct; top grounds R1, R3 and R2 at 8 points short; none meets the court-readiness bar (every Takhar limb at 4 or more). Detail: reopening grounds assessment.

Lessons report (if appropriate)

None

No lessons report this period.

← HR-03 · All highlight reports · HR-05 →

PRINCE2 7 outlines: sources · product set · archive